#55928 - 06/13/05 12:20 PM
fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 3075
Loc: Cleveland, OH
|
|
well lately it seems i haven't been getting quite the same fuel economy on my DIC... i havent been driving THAT crazy...but usually im hangin around 25-27 and now im at 23, and cant seem to bring it up even after a decent highway ride. think i should change my fuel filter? never done it..and where would i get one?
also, i wanted to know what you guys thought about using higher octane fuels, specifically in the GT with no boost. i know high octane is used to prevent knock from happening, but is there anything else 'premium' about this fuel? and is there ANY knock on a GT? i have a choice of 87, 89, 93, and 94 at my local station.. thanks
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55929 - 06/13/05 12:54 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 05/05/05
Posts: 122
Loc: Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
I wish there was a 91 level . I've heard rumors that the higher the octane level the more amount of time the fuel lasts. But I don't know if thats true.
_________________________
Clear Corners, Silver Star turning lights, Silver Star headlights, Diamond Series foglights, Megan Racing muffler, Interior pulseing blue lights, Borla MPG mod. Much more to come.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55930 - 06/13/05 01:27 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 07/15/04
Posts: 3141
Loc: Chicago, IL
|
|
It's not hard to change the fuel filter. This will help: http://www.pfyc.com/supportfiles/gasfilter/ You can get one at a local parts store. Personally, I would stick with OE. As for fuel, there is knock. This is the tricky part... if you don't have mods, then I wouldn't worry about it too much. Think it would be a waste of your money. However, if you do have mods, then premium is a must.
_________________________
DHP V1.0, Slotted rotors, S/S Brake Lines, Custom CAI, GMPP Handling Kit, KYB's, Jimmy C DP (U-Bend delete w/ Hi-flow cat), Flowmaster Super 40's, drilled 180° T-Stat, Alt. Rewire & Alt. Voltage Booster Combo, 605's, ZZP Motor Mounts
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I am NOT mad!" - Dali
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55931 - 06/13/05 02:14 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Junior Member
|
Registered: 05/23/05
Posts: 18
Loc: Syracuse, NY
|
|
I don't think you'll see much difference in MPG by changing the fuel filter not to say it isn't a bad idea. I live in a hilly area south of Syracuse NY and I typically see what you're getting and I just replaced all the typical items you replace at 60k(plugs, fuel, air, etc) Even after installing the U-bend delete I didn't see a huge change in MPG either. I went up to the Adirondacks over the weekend and was getting 30 mpg on the thruway at ~75mph.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55933 - 06/13/05 04:01 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 3075
Loc: Cleveland, OH
|
|
Originally posted by HercMan: As for higher octane. Any unboosted car will see no gain in mpg by upping the octane level. Unless you have lots of carbon build up and your engine is experiencing KR. i'd be more interested in performance... would there be a difference between 91 and 94 with a standard intense pcm?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55934 - 06/13/05 04:08 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 08/09/03
Posts: 3256
Loc: Oregon
|
|
Originally posted by zuulmusic: Originally posted by HercMan: [b] As for higher octane. Any unboosted car will see no gain in mpg by upping the octane level. Unless you have lots of carbon build up and your engine is experiencing KR. i'd be more interested in performance... would there be a difference between 91 and 94 with a standard intense pcm? [/b]I believe the only thing higher octane does is help fight KR (as Herc said). So, if you currently have KR then a higher octane would free up some HP and give more power. If you don't have any KR, switching to higher octane would be a waste. At least this is what I've always read.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55935 - 06/13/05 06:08 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 05/23/03
Posts: 8078
Loc: Austin, TX
|
|
Zuul, try running a can of injector cleaner in your fuel tank. This might help. I run a can in at about every oil change.
_________________________
Bobby Died 5/1/08, resurrected 5/15/08 ASCD SD hood, 17" Bullitts, Overkill PCM, 3.4" Pulley, NGK TR55IX, K&N 9" cone filter, JimmyC D/P, U-bend removed, Flowmaster 40 series, Hooker big bore tips with resonators, S/B brake lines, drilled/slot rotors, GMPP handling kit, KYB struts, F&R strut supports, HID's, LED's, 2.5" Air Dam, red GTP overlays on custom badges, white rear insert.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55936 - 06/13/05 06:22 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 03/26/03
Posts: 2481
Loc: Franklin, MA
|
|
Higher octane fuel will get you better MPG.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55938 - 06/13/05 08:54 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 05/01/02
Posts: 2126
Loc: Portland Or.
|
|
Hello,
I used to run premium in my little Blazer, until I read an article that it may actually be detrimental to an engine that doesn't require it. I noticed a gain of a couple MPG on the freeway after switching from "Premium" to "Plus". I'm afraid to drop to regular.
Later now, Clint
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55939 - 06/14/05 07:20 AM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 03/26/03
Posts: 2481
Loc: Franklin, MA
|
|
It gives me about 3 mpg in my bike.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55941 - 06/14/05 09:53 AM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 3075
Loc: Cleveland, OH
|
|
so is there anything premium about premium besides the octane rating?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55942 - 06/14/05 10:48 AM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 07/15/04
Posts: 3141
Loc: Chicago, IL
|
|
Originally posted by zuulmusic: so is there anything premium about premium besides the octane rating? The cost???
_________________________
DHP V1.0, Slotted rotors, S/S Brake Lines, Custom CAI, GMPP Handling Kit, KYB's, Jimmy C DP (U-Bend delete w/ Hi-flow cat), Flowmaster Super 40's, drilled 180° T-Stat, Alt. Rewire & Alt. Voltage Booster Combo, 605's, ZZP Motor Mounts
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I am NOT mad!" - Dali
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55944 - 06/14/05 01:50 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 162
Loc: Long Beach,MS
|
|
Here is something I learned while in a mechanics class: On modern engines with sophisticated engine management systems, the engine can operate efficiently on fuels of a wider range of octane rating, but there remains an optimum octane for the engine under specific driving conditions. Older cars without such systems are more restricted in their choice of fuel, as the engine can not automatically adjust to accommodate lower octane fuel. Because knock is so destructive, owners of older cars must use fuel that will not knock under the most demanding conditions they encounter, and must continue to use that fuel, even if they only occasionally require the octane.
If you are already using the proper octane fuel, you will not obtain more power from higher octane fuels. The engine will be already operating at optimum settings, and a higher octane should have no effect on the management system. Your driveability and fuel economy will remain the same. The higher octane fuel costs more, so you are just throwing money away. If you are already using a fuel with an octane rating slightly below the optimum, then using a higher octane fuel will cause the engine management system to move to the optimum settings, possibly resulting in both increased power and improved fuel economy. You may be able to change octanes between seasons ( reduce octane in winter ) to obtain the most cost-effective fuel without loss of driveability.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55945 - 06/14/05 02:06 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 11/13/04
Posts: 70
Loc: Copperas Cove, TX
|
|
The best thing to do is use the octane the factory recommends and to use a total fuel system cleaner with each oil change. Much cheaper and better in the long run. No, the best thing to do is scan for KR. If you're getting no KR with 87, then going to 89 is a waste. If you have KR with 87, and you go to 89 and get no KR, then going to 91+ is a waste. You can't go with what the factory recommends unless your car is the way it came from the factory. Modded cars need to be scanned to tell what you need. My .02
_________________________
Black '99 GT Coupe: 15.2 @ 88.6 Red '97 GT Coupe: FWI Gold '00 Blazer: Might hand TexasGP his ass with the new intake...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55946 - 06/14/05 04:49 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 354
Loc: Michigan
|
|
Hercman, I did a search and found out that the difference between RON and the (R+M)/2 is 1.0454 to 1 (RON to R+M/2). So your bike requires 91 * 0.9565 = 87.04 R+M/2 gasoline. So regular 87 should be just fine for your bike. Hope this helps. Here is the link that I got the information from: http://www.asmaracing.com/TracksideSupport.html
_________________________
"I'm on one of them there special diets. I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics." - Mater
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55948 - 06/14/05 11:10 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 04/22/05
Posts: 3075
Loc: Cleveland, OH
|
|
i've got a scanner coming in about a week or so hopefully.... im eager to check out the knock retard!!!!!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#55949 - 06/14/05 11:17 PM
Re: fuel economy // octane
|
Member
|
Registered: 05/05/05
Posts: 122
Loc: Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
Originally posted by framos242: Originally posted by zuulmusic: [b] so is there anything premium about premium besides the octane rating? The cost??? [/b]
_________________________
Clear Corners, Silver Star turning lights, Silver Star headlights, Diamond Series foglights, Megan Racing muffler, Interior pulseing blue lights, Borla MPG mod. Much more to come.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|