Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#150109 - 12/22/03 03:45 PM Re: 3.8 vs 3800
Paul Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 18
Loc: Island Co. WA, USA
Actually, the 3.8 got the even fire hardware hardware in mid-'77, two years after GM bought the tooling back from AMC. (They had sold the Buick V6 tooling to AMC/Jeep in 1969 or 1970.) When GM first put the 90 degree V6's in their FWD cars, they had a 3.1L version as well as the 3.8L. The current 3.1's are based off of the 2.8L and there's also a 3.4L. There's also a DOHC 3.1L 60* V6 that was developed from the 2.8 family. In both the 2.8L family and the 3.8L family there are FWD and RWD/4WD variants and due to block differences, most parts don't interchange between their drive varaints.

I've got a '71 Jeep CJ-5 that came with a 225 (3.7L) V6 and researched my options before deciding it was most cost effective to get more power by swapping in a V8. I've also got an '86 Cherokee that came with a 2.8L GM V6 and is getting a SFI 3.4L from a '94 Camaro. I've also got a couple of FWD 2.8L's hanging around collecting dust/rust... anyone wants them, they can have them, free.
_________________________
Paul
Top



Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted
3.8 vs 3800 gary 09/22/02 09:46 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Paul 12/21/03 06:23 AM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Bryan R 12/22/03 02:08 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Paul 12/22/03 03:45 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Paul 12/22/03 05:48 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 EnYgMa 01/15/04 03:02 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Gozilla 02/15/04 04:28 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 EnYgMa 02/18/04 05:02 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Gozilla 02/18/04 05:26 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Adam S. 02/21/04 03:27 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Gozilla 02/22/04 10:22 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Jizz 04/15/04 11:40 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Gozilla 04/16/04 06:33 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 pgp2000gt 05/13/04 07:21 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Jizz 05/13/04 07:55 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 4 T 8 states 05/14/04 06:57 PM
Re: 3.8 vs 3800 Gozilla 05/19/04 06:55 PM