Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#211627 - 05/10/05 02:46 PM Re: GXP Review
rayainsw Offline
Member
Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 51
Loc: atlanta
“I'm upset other car companies got v6's smaller than ours making 300. But we got to go to a v8 that is over 5 liters. “

I am confused.

The Acura RL is one of the (very) few V6s in a current production car that have 300 + / - HP. And the TQ on that 3.5L V6 is only 260 – up at 5,000 rpm. I’d much prefer to have the GXP’s 300+ at low RPM (and 323 at peak, and a relatively flat curve) in most of my daily driving. . .

R&T (often posting the quickest times, recently) published a 0 – 60 time of 6.7 and a quarter mile time of 15.1 @ 95.1 for the RL. (Part of this is due to the weight: Just over 4,000 pounds. But part is certainly due to the relatively low maximum TQ - and a rather ‘peaky’ TQ curve – compared to the 5.3L V8.)

The only published GXP acceleration numbers I have seen were the MT numbers of 6.0 and 14.3 @ 98+. I’ll take the GXP’s numbers over the RL’s.

The EPA fuel mileage estimates for the RL are 18 / 26. The GXP is 17 / 28. So the smaller V6 does not appear to have much of an advantage here either.

And to buy an RL, you must take AWD (living near HotLanta, I do NOT want to carry that added weight and complexity and driveline drag around for the life of the vehicle) a NAV system – and an MSRP up near $50K.

I suppose the Infiniti G35’s V6 also qualifies, as the 2005 now is rated at 298 HP. But it is rated at 270 TQ. At 4800 rpm. And even with a 6-speed manual trans., the same article in MT quotes 0 – 60 at 5.8 and the Quarter in 14.1 at 99.7. (EPA 19 / 26.) If you really want RWD (or AWD as an option) and a manual trans., the G certainly merits a look. But I generally prefer the way a V8 goes about delivering both maximum performance and general overall driveability – compared to these V6s. But that’s just me.

And that 5.3L V8 is actually lighter than the S/C 3800.

I think the GXP – at $29.9K (base including Dest.) and widely available today for something like Invoice + $49 less current incentives in the $2,500 range = actual transaction price of approx. $25K.

This strikes me as a “screaming bargain” – if it fits what you are looking for . .

- Ray
Thinking it MAY fit what I want . . .
Top



Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted
GXP Review Mike Lewis 05/05/05 05:38 PM
Re: GXP Review AustinGTP 05/05/05 06:20 PM
Re: GXP Review framos242 05/06/05 10:12 AM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/06/05 03:27 PM
Re: GXP Review Jizz 05/09/05 07:40 AM
Re: GXP Review TastyBake 05/09/05 10:58 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/10/05 02:46 PM
Re: GXP Review Jizz 05/10/05 03:05 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/10/05 03:24 PM
Re: GXP Review BryantGTP 05/10/05 03:41 PM
Re: GXP Review Jizz 05/10/05 08:56 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/12/05 01:56 PM
Re: GXP Review Arcxnus 05/12/05 04:00 PM
Re: GXP Review UMfan 05/12/05 05:51 PM
Re: GXP Review TastyBake 05/15/05 10:26 PM
Re: GXP Review Jizz 05/16/05 07:54 AM
Re: GXP Review TastyBake 05/17/05 12:26 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/17/05 02:19 PM
Re: GXP Review why2kmax 05/17/05 04:36 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 05/19/05 09:18 AM
Re: GXP Review framos242 06/02/05 03:42 PM
Re: GXP Review AustinGTP 06/02/05 06:14 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/03/05 08:25 AM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/03/05 08:33 AM
Re: GXP Review AustinGTP 06/03/05 02:40 PM
Re: GXP Review BrianR 06/03/05 02:51 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/03/05 04:08 PM
Re: GXP Review AustinGTP 06/03/05 06:11 PM
Re: GXP Review BrianR 06/04/05 09:57 AM
Re: GXP Review BrianR 06/08/05 04:23 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/09/05 07:55 AM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/09/05 06:54 PM
Re: GXP Review AustinGTP 06/09/05 07:00 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/10/05 07:19 AM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/13/05 02:53 PM
Re: GXP Review rayainsw 06/30/05 02:17 PM

Moderator:  AustinGTP, Marc Harbison, Redshift